Neuroweapons and the Fight for Brain Privacy

While Dr. Robert Duncan has acknowledged past affiliation with U.S. intelligence agencies, Bryan Kofron has stated that he worked for a security firm affiliated with a well-known company, and the recent TechNative documentary presents evidence implicating several individuals and organizations, Neuroethics Now does not attribute blame to any specific individual, group, organization, or company for the phenomena described here. Our intent is simply to present a curated collection of relevant videos, lectures, and personal testimonies for your consideration.

We ask that you engage with this content openly. Our sole objective is to bring greater public awareness to this phenomenon. To protect the anonymity of those featured in our civilian panel, we have chosen to obscure their identities, in recognition that this subject remains contested and not universally accepted. If this material informs even a small number of previously unaware individuals, we will consider the time and resources we have invested worthwhile.

To date, our organization has reached out to thousands of relevant professionals and institutions, including human rights organizations, civil rights and technology patent attorneys, the Boston Bar Association, brain-computer interface companies, local legislators and academic labs and research hubs working across brain-computer interfaces, cybernetics, cognitive processing, artificial intelligence, NeuroAI, neuroscience, neurotechnology, neurobiology, neurophotonics, nanotechnology, medical ethics, bioethics, and neuroethics.

We respectfully request your time in reviewing this material and, if warranted, supporting further investigation. We believe it is essential for the public to understand the complexities of this issue, as anyone could potentially become affected. Continued inaction carries real risk.

If this content resonates with you and you would like to contribute, we invite you to visit the "Contact Us" page of our website. 

Specifically:

Academics and researchers: We encourage you to study this phenomenon and consider publishing peer-reviewed findings.

Human rights organizations: We welcome partnership in providing resources and support to those affected.

Legislators and legal professionals: We ask for your assistance in advancing neuroethical legislation that addresses criminal responsibility, cognitive liberty, and safeguards against privacy violations and unauthorized neural intervention.